“It is right to ask that question … Everyone knows that what is happening there is not good,” he mentioned, earlier than referring to a Dutch soccer affiliation (KNVB) assertion ruling out a boycott.
“Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have said that if we go there, we can better promote the cause.”
After years of strain from human rights teams, Qatar has lately modified its labour legal guidelines to dismantle a lot of its “kafala” sponsorship system, absolving staff of the necessity to get the permission of the employer who sponsored their visa to be able to change jobs or go away the nation.
It has additionally elevated the minimal wage by 25% to 1,000 riyals ($275) a month, and utilized it to all staff, moderately than Qataris solely.
Britain’s Guardian reported a month in the past that not less than 6,500 migrant staff — lots of them engaged on World Cup tasks – had died in Qatar because it received the correct to stage the World Cup 10 years in the past, in keeping with the paper’s calculations from official data.
In response, Qatar mentioned the variety of deaths was proportionate to the dimensions of the migrant workforce, and included many non-manual staff, however that each life misplaced was a tragedy.
It additionally mentioned well being and security reforms had helped to steadily scale back employee mortality during the last decade.
The Dutch authorities postponed a commerce mission to Qatar this month, citing considerations for the migrants engaged on preparations for the World Cup.
The Netherlands’ crew captain, Georginio Wijnaldum, advised the information convention the gamers had mentioned the problem.
“It’s a big topic, but we all believe we should go there if we qualify. Then we can have a greater impact on change.”